This is a meditative approach which I (when I remember to) use as often as I can, in every field of life where it is possible. Painting is a good place to practise, because nothing important can go wrong, and it is really challenging for an artist to stay detached from the art.

Here are the thoughts and images of one who aims humbly for that one treasure known as Enlightenment, Moksha, Nirvana, or The Kingdom of Heaven. I share with the reader the little insight and experience I am given on this quest of Love. I will have nothing new to say, but the way I express it will be genuine and honest. If a single phrase or painting come to be helpful to others, this whole mess will be worth the while. Well met, traveller.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Thy Will Be Done
When making these images, I try to reduce myself from the equation. The only thing I bring into them willingly is the "from the center and out" composition. Apart from that I ignore what's happening in the process of painting. This is not to say that I don't care, but I accept any color and form that shows up, and I try to avoid judging them. By letting go of my own preferences and ideas of what painting, balance and good art is, the canvas becomes a field of practise. I learn letting go. I learn being present, and I learn acceptance, which is almost the same thing. You can't have one without the other.
This is a meditative approach which I (when I remember to) use as often as I can, in every field of life where it is possible. Painting is a good place to practise, because nothing important can go wrong, and it is really challenging for an artist to stay detached from the art.
This is a meditative approach which I (when I remember to) use as often as I can, in every field of life where it is possible. Painting is a good place to practise, because nothing important can go wrong, and it is really challenging for an artist to stay detached from the art.
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Pondering Creation
The Creating Power, that which was
before Creation, is generally considered to be eternal – uncreated
in itself. God, Brahman (as Brahma) or whatever we call it, has
always been, and from its being, the Universe somehow came into
existence. As human beings, producers of tools and art, we tend to
think of Creation as an act of construction. We tend to think about
it as a decision made, followed by an act of crafting, which is the
process we typically follow when we make various items.
However, if we look at the idea of Creation from the perspective of Eternity, we may come to look very differently at it. There are two ways of thinking about an eternal Creator, as I see it. “He” either exists outside of time, or He exists forever and ever. Existence/Being outside of time is really hard for the human mind to comprehend, but for the sake of this argument we may think of time-less existence and eternal existence as the same thing, and formulated as a story it goes something like this:
Initially God IS. God has always been. For countless eons, eternities followed by eternities (try to picture it), God is. There is nothing else. The existence of God is all that is, and this is-ness has no beginning. So here is the question: Why would God , suddenly one “day” consider to create a Universe? What would, after an infinite number of “days”, cause God to stir in this way? There is nothing outside of “Him” to provoke a change or a decision. What would then give rise to this desire, need, or wish in God?
I don't know about the reader, but for my own sake, this question, together with the idea of Oneness, made me look very differently at the concept of Creation. I no longer understand Creation as an act at all. I think of Creation as being something visible only from the human perspective – from the perspective of time, so to speak. I don't think God changed anything at all. I believe that Time and Space are ways of perceiving God. When God interprets Himself in a certain way, He understands Himself as The Universe.
Can an infinite, eternal power change? … and what does It change in relation to?
With this in mind let's take a look at John 1:1-1:4:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men.”
A simple image may arise of Christ sitting by the side of the Throne of God, anticipating his future arrival, but for me these lines speak about the very nature of the Creator. They tell me that In God is the possibility (inevitability) of Creation. In Timeless Being, the perspective of Time exists from scratch. Christ is not only a means of salvation, but also that trait of God which made us possible to begin with. “...and that life was the light of men”. Christ is materialization.
Have you ever seen one of those pictures which you can read in two different ways? (do you see the young lady, or the old hag?) I suggest, that the Universe came about in a similar fashion. That which IS didn't add anything new, because there was nothing to be added. It simply beholds its own dynamic Mystery, and in its Consciousness, time and space is perceived. Bang!
That is how we perceive the world, and that is why we call ourselves “We”. God is ONE, and I wonder... from His perspective, Creation might never have happened...? I believe that we are ONE with Him right now. We are simply unable to comprehend it. Experiencing this is what Enlightenment/Salvation is about, as I understand it.
Let's end this post with going back to John 17:21: ”... that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us...”
However, if we look at the idea of Creation from the perspective of Eternity, we may come to look very differently at it. There are two ways of thinking about an eternal Creator, as I see it. “He” either exists outside of time, or He exists forever and ever. Existence/Being outside of time is really hard for the human mind to comprehend, but for the sake of this argument we may think of time-less existence and eternal existence as the same thing, and formulated as a story it goes something like this:
Initially God IS. God has always been. For countless eons, eternities followed by eternities (try to picture it), God is. There is nothing else. The existence of God is all that is, and this is-ness has no beginning. So here is the question: Why would God , suddenly one “day” consider to create a Universe? What would, after an infinite number of “days”, cause God to stir in this way? There is nothing outside of “Him” to provoke a change or a decision. What would then give rise to this desire, need, or wish in God?
I don't know about the reader, but for my own sake, this question, together with the idea of Oneness, made me look very differently at the concept of Creation. I no longer understand Creation as an act at all. I think of Creation as being something visible only from the human perspective – from the perspective of time, so to speak. I don't think God changed anything at all. I believe that Time and Space are ways of perceiving God. When God interprets Himself in a certain way, He understands Himself as The Universe.
Can an infinite, eternal power change? … and what does It change in relation to?
![]() |
Let there be... |
With this in mind let's take a look at John 1:1-1:4:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men.”
A simple image may arise of Christ sitting by the side of the Throne of God, anticipating his future arrival, but for me these lines speak about the very nature of the Creator. They tell me that In God is the possibility (inevitability) of Creation. In Timeless Being, the perspective of Time exists from scratch. Christ is not only a means of salvation, but also that trait of God which made us possible to begin with. “...and that life was the light of men”. Christ is materialization.
Have you ever seen one of those pictures which you can read in two different ways? (do you see the young lady, or the old hag?) I suggest, that the Universe came about in a similar fashion. That which IS didn't add anything new, because there was nothing to be added. It simply beholds its own dynamic Mystery, and in its Consciousness, time and space is perceived. Bang!
That is how we perceive the world, and that is why we call ourselves “We”. God is ONE, and I wonder... from His perspective, Creation might never have happened...? I believe that we are ONE with Him right now. We are simply unable to comprehend it. Experiencing this is what Enlightenment/Salvation is about, as I understand it.
Let's end this post with going back to John 17:21: ”... that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us...”
Friday, March 9, 2012
The Single Light
When it comes to art, I'm currently
working on a series of paintings, which I think I will continue for
some time ahead. In periods where I manage a more sincere spiritual
effort my heart seems to sing out for one "thing" only, and all other
interests fall away and look like silly pastime play. I
find myself embracing expressions I can manage from a point of
emptiness - ways of painting that require no thought or story.
Painting becomes synonymous with meditation.
![]() |
Light IV |
![]() |
Light V |
![]() |
Light VI |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)